Attitude and Anxiety of Physiotherapy Students Towards Research: A Cross-sectional Survey
Keywords:
Research, Attitude, Anxiety, Physiotherapy StudentsAbstract
Background: Physiotherapy research promotes optimum care for patients through evidence-based physiotherapy practice. Students' attitude towards research motivates them to engage in research, develop research skills and apply research findings in clinical settings to promote positive patients outcome. Aim: The aim of this study is to analyse the attitudes and anxiety of undergraduate Physiotherapy students towards research component. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was carried out with purposively selected students (n=150) from one physiotherapy college (Third-year BPT, final year BPT and internee). With informed voluntary consent, data on students’ attitude and anxie-ty toward research were collected using Attitudes Toward Research (ATR) scale which was devised by Elena T. Papanastasiou in 2005. ATR consists of 32 items measured on a 7- point Likert scale. A value of 1 indicates a response of ‘strongly disagree’ and a value of 7 corresponds to ‘strongly agree’. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 20. Results: Most of the participants (80%) reported that research is useful for the career. Positive attitude towards research was demonstrated by 69.33% physiotherapy students and 63.33% reported that research plays an im-portant role in professional and personal life. However, a large proportion of students (72.67%) have anxiety towards research and 74% of students reported for research difficulty. Conclusion: Although many of the students have a fa-vourable attitude towards the research and acknowledge its usefulness and benefit to physiotherapy profession, many of them perceived their research course as stressful and have anxiety towards the research.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
1. Swindoll CR. Quotable quotes. Retrieved on December. 2012;16: 2013..
2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitude-behavior relations: A the-oretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psy-chological bulletin. 1977 Sep;84(5):888.
3. Oguan FE, Bernal MM, Pinca MC. Attitude and anxiety towards research, its influence on the students’ achievement in the course. Asian Journal of Manage-ment Sciences &Education. 2014 Oct;3(4):165-72.
4. Harsha Kumar H, Jayaram S, Kumar GS, Vinita J, Rohit S, Satish M, et al. Perception, Practices Towards Re-search and Predictors of Research Career Among UG Medical Students from Coastal South India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Indian J Community Med. 2009;34:306-9.
5. Zan R, Di Martino P. Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. 2007 Nov;3:157-68.
6. Papanastasiou EC. Factor structure of the attitudes toward research scale. Statistics Education Research Journal. 2005 May; 4(1):16-26.
7. Adams NA, Holcomb WR. Analysis of the relationship between anxiety about mathematics and performance. Psychological Reports. 1986 Oct;59(2):943-8.
8. Wise SL. The development and validation of a scale measuring attitudes toward statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1985 Jul;45(2):401-5.
9. Shaukat S, Siddiquah A, Abiodullah M, Akbar RA. Post-graduate Students' Attitudes towards Research. Bulle-tin of Education and Research. 2014 Jun 1;36(1).
10. Siemens DR, Punnen S, Wong J, Kanji N. A survey on the attitudes towards research in medical school. BMC medical education. 2010 Dec; 10(1):4.
11. Sabzwari S, Kauser S, Khuwaja AK. Experiences, atti-tudes and barriers towards research amongst junior faculty of Pakistani medical universities. BMC medical education. 2009 Dec;9(1):68.
12. Zan R, Di Martino P. Attitude toward mathematics: Overcoming the positive/negative dichotomy. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. 2007 Nov;3: 157-68.
13. Aljadi SH, Alrowayeh HN, Alotaibi NM, et al. Research amongst Physical Therapists in the State of Kuwait: Participation, Perception, Attitude and Barriers. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22: 561– 566.
14. Al Furaikh SS, Al Omairi BE, Ganapathy T. A cross-sectional survey on nursing students' attitude towards research. Journal of Health Specialties. 2017 Oct 1;5(4):185.
15. Alghamdi KM, Moussa NA, Alessa DS, Alothimeen N, Al.Saud AS.Perceptions, attitudes and practices toward research among senior medical students. Saudi Pharm J .2014;22:113-7
16. Al‑Nashmy F, Al-Shalawy F, Haleem A. Knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers towards scientific re-search among undergraduate health sciences students in the central province of Saudi Arabia. Educ Med J. 2015;7:16-21.
17. Amin T, Kaliyadan F, Al Qattan E, Al Majed M, Al Khan-jaf H, Mirza M. Knowledge, attitudes and barriers relat-ed to participation of medical students in research in three Arab Universities. Educ Med J .2012;4:16- 21.
18. Siamian H, Mahmoudi R, Habibi F, et al. Students’ Atti-tudes Towards Research at Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences in 2015. Mater Sociomed. 2016; 28(6):468–472.
19. Arif A, Siddiqui MA, Aziz K, et al. Perception towards research among undergraduate physical therapy stu-dents. Biom Biostat Int J. 2018;7(3):171‒175.
20. Soe HH, Than NN, Lwin H, Htay MN, Phyu KL, Abas AL. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward research: The perspectives of undergraduate medical and dental students. Journal of education and health promotion. 2018;7.
21. Anbari Z, Mohammadbeigi A, Jadidi R. Barriers and challenges in researches by Iranian students of medical universities. Perspect Clin Res .2015;6:98-103.
22. Hallberg IR. Evidence based nursing, interventions and family nursing: Methodological obstacles and pos-sibilities. J Fam Nurs .2003;9:3-22 23. Meraj L, Gul N, Zubaidazain AI, Akhter I, Iram F, Khan AS, et al.Perceptions and attitudes towards research amongst medical students at Shifa College of Medicine. J Pak Med Assoc .2016;66:165-89.
24. Deicke W, Gess C, Ruess J. Increasing students' re-search interests through research-based learning at Humboldt University. Council on Undergraduate Re-search Quarterly. 2014 Sep 22;35(1):27-34.
25. Papanastasiou EC, Kosta E, Trichas S, Nicolaou S, Panagiotou T.Predicting Achievement in a Research Methods Course. Paper Presented at the Biennial Con-ference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus; 23-27 Au-gust, 2005.
26. Kiekkas P, Panagiotarou A, Malja A, Tahirai D, Zykai R, Bakalis N, et al. Nursing students’ attitudes toward sta-tistics: Effect of a biostatistics course and association with examination performance. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:1283‑8.
27. Tingen MS, Burnett AH, Murchison RB, Zhu H. The im-portance of nursing research. J Nurs Educ. 2009;48:167‑70.
28. Bjo rkstro m ME, Johansson IS, Hamrin EK, Athlin EE. Swedish nursing students’ attitudes to and awareness of research and development within nursing. J Adv Nurs 2003;41:393-402.
29. Onwuegbuzie AJ. Academic procrastination and statis-tics anxiety.Assess Eval High Educ 2004;29:3-18.
30. Papanastasiou EC, Papanastasiou C. Modeling mathe-matics achievement in Cyprus. In Contexts of learning mathematics and science 2006 Apr 18 (pp. 139-152). Routledge.
31. Mathew L, Aktan NM. Nursing student attitudes toward statistics.J Nurs Educ 2014;53:233-7.
32. Taylor S, Muncer S. Redressing the power and effect of significance. A new approach to an old problem: Teach-ing statistics to nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2000;20:358-64.
33. Nel D, Burman RJ, Hoffman R, Randera, Rees S. The attitudes of medical students to research. S Afr Med J .2013;104:33-6.
34. Wilson VA, Onwuegbuzie AJ. Increasing and Decreasing Anxiety: A Study of Doctoral Students in Education Re-search Courses.
35. Scaria V. Whisking research into medical curriculum. Calicut Med J. 2004;2(1):1-4.
36. Lalayants M. Overcoming graduate students’ negative perceptions of statistics. J Teach Soc Work. 2012;32:356-75
37. Griffith JD, Adams LT, Gu LL, Hart CL, Nichols‑White-head P. Students’ attitudes towards statistics across the disciplines: A mixed methods approach. Stat Educ Res J .2012; 1192: 45-6.
